Sunday, November 14, 2010

Arizona's Proposition 203, Legalizing Medical Marijuana

We conducted our survey with these questions.
Demographic Questions:
1. Male or Female?
(M/F)

2. What grade level are you?
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
3. Are you Employed or Unemployed?
Employed
Unemployed

4. Do you take AP or Honors courses?
(Y/N)

5. Do you participate in extracurricular activities?
(Y/N)


Questions actually pertaining to Prop 203:
6. How would you vote on the legalization of marijuana for medicinal use?
  • Yes
  • No
  • I don't know
7. How would you identify yourself?
  • Catholic/Christian
  • Spiritual
  • Other faith
  • Atheist/Agnostic
8. Have you read the guidelines of Proposition 203?
  • Yes
  • No
9. Do you know what conditions were proposed for medicinal marijuana use in AZ?
  • Yes
  • No
    Question 1
    Religious impact was very interesting. All the groups except for "other faith" had a majority of its members say "yes." Although Christians/Catholics had 44% of members say yes, the members were split; 29% said no and the other 27% were very reluctant. The students who were considered spiritual all voted yes and 85% of Atheists/Agnostics voted yes. Those who answered "other faith" did not really seem to have much of an opinion and half omitted answering and went with "I don't know."
    It seemed that age had the biggest impact on peoples' views on marijuana. Freshmen were likely to say no (43%), but they were split, many did not have much of an opinion. Sophomores had more yes votes, but were still split on the issue. Then along came Junior year, and 70% of the new upper class men voted yes, Seniors were about the same, coming in slightly higher at 71%.
    Class difficulty did not have much of a impact of opinions, both AP/Honors students and General Ed. students were more likely to vote yes (Approximately 55%).
    Involvement in extracurriculars did not have much of an impact either; still both members were more likely to vote yes (Approximately 55%).
    Those who knew the conditions medical marijuana would be prescribed for were more likely to vote yes (67%); those who did not know what conditions medical marijuana would be prescribed for were all over the board split among yes, no and I don't know.
    Honestly I am not sure about the accuracy of this one, when I was polling it seemed like many students were lying about this question. Though it seems for both groups, it did not have much of an impact. The majority of both groups said yes, with those who "read" it at 60% and those who did not at 51%.
    Gender did not seem to have much of an effect on peoples decisions, when I was polling I did notice that when people were unsure about their answer, Guys were more likely to omit and just say I don't know or I don't really have an opinion.

    The main point has been answered in question 1 and the above information. Everything below this is to see how demographics affect questions 3 and 4.
    Question 3
    Age was the only factor that really impacted whether or not students had actually seen prop 203. Freshmen through Juniors largely had not read prop 203; however, the Seniors were more balanced out and a larger percentage of Seniors had read prop 203.
    Gender did not have an impact on who read prop 203 and who did not.
    Class difficulty did not have an effect on who read prop 203 and who did not.
    Extracurricular activities did not have an impact on who read prop 203 and who did not.
    Employment status did not have an impact on who read prop 203 and who did not.
    Question 4
    Age was the biggest factor in whether people knew what conditions were proposed for medicinal marijuana use. The majority of Freshmen and Sophomores did not know. The Junior's knowledge is close to 50/50. The Seniors are the only class that had the majority of its members answer yes.

    Those who are employed have better knowledge of the conditions medical marijuana would be prescribed for than the unemployed; 61% of the employed answered yes while only 39% of the unemployed answered yes. (Corresponds with graph below)
    Gender did not seem to have an impact on who knew the conditions for which medical marijuana would be prescribed for and who did not. Females were slightly more knowledgeable than Males though.
    Class difficulty did not seem to have an impact on who knew the conditions for which medical marijuana would be prescribed for and who did not.
    Extracurricular activities did not seem to have an impact on who knew the conditions for which medical marijuana would be prescribed for and who did not.

    Overall Summary
    A person's grade level affected their decisions and knowledge of proposition 203 the most. Younger students were more against prop 203 and knew less about it while the older students supported prop 203 and knew more about it. Religion was the second biggest factor that impacted a persons position on medical marijuana. Nothing else seemed to have a significant impact on how students supported prop 203.

    When it comes to error, it was a lot harder than I thought it would be to make this perfect. I would have been so much easier to analyze the data if we had more equally polled according to demographics, e.g. polled 25 students from each class, half guys half girls, half honors or AP and half general ed, & c. Second I think giving people the option to pick "I don't know" for an answer may not have been a good idea. When people were iffy on the issue they said "I don't know" and quite a few people used it. It would have been better to give options like "Yes," "I'm not sure but I leaning towards yes," "No," and "I'm not sure but I leaning towards no." Lastly I could tell when polling people that many students did not really care too much and just took the poll because they did not want to seem rude and say no, so I do not think people were as accurate with their answers as they could have been

    17 comments:

    1. According to your graphs, it seems as though more students that are older, in honors/AP, and extracurricular activites are all for the legalization of medical marijuana, the majority is also unemployed. I don't know if this is either because they are too busy with thier honors classes and extracurricular activities or that they are the ones smoking pot and want to promote the circulation of it.

      ReplyDelete
    2. I'm not surprised that age/grade was the biggest cleavage for these resutls. When I was a freshmen, not only did I not know anything about (or give a crap really) about politics, let alone Know about any of the propositions. Secondly as a freshmen I was very naive about weed and probably didn't even know that it was an option to use it legally as medicine. It wasn't until like the end of freshmen year/sophomore year that I became more informed. I'm sure there are plenty of other freshmen who are like I was. The results about religion kind of didn't make sense to me though. Kind of how I was surprised with the results for abortion, I would have though since BC and Anthem itself is such a Christian community, that most would have opposed the legalization.
      I would have thought there would have been a bigger difference between the way gen ed. and honors voted too. Not All honors kids have this subject matter taken up in class or take the time to look it up on their own, but at least Some should. I was kind of expecting a bigger difference.
      On a personal note, I'm so happy it passed!
      I'm jealous of your guys' topic. But you did a lovely job :)

      ReplyDelete
    3. It's really no suprise to see how many people you polled did not read or knew the conditions of the prop but still mamged to vote yes. Personally I believe this is the wrong group to tax because of the maturity level. I beleieve that high school teenagers can not handle serious questions when it comes to medical marijuana. That was most likely was the biggest sampling error. I thought the faith question was a really good idea because it would relate the questions almost into correlated answers.

      ReplyDelete
    4. I liked the graphs! You did a great job of visually representing the results, as well as continuing on to explain them. Regarding the graph of who read the proposition and who did not, some people may consider the reading of articles or opionions ABOUT the proposition to be the same thing as reading the proposition...
      I think the employed vs. unemployed cleavage was very interesting; I would not have predicted that.

      ReplyDelete
    5. What i find absolutley hilarious is that as you get older your more likely to support marijuana. In my opinion it doesnt really have much to do with politics. It has to do with innocense. When you enter highschool your terrified of all these drugs and then as you get older your more exposed to drugs like marijuana etc, and many people (especially those who do it) become more tolerant to stuff like that.

      Anyway, thats all i have to say! you guys did really good!! Love the design and stuff too. supports your poll.

      ReplyDelete
    6. As shallow as this sounds, I like your choice of background and the way that your blog had both bar and pie graphs interspersed throughout- it definitely is easier to read.
      This is a very controversial topic, and it is also very polarizing. Either way, considering the nature of the subject, the results from high school students are fascinating.
      The religious aspect of your poll was intriguing. I think it's a testament to the religious climate of Anthem. I wonder, though, what made the students of "other faiths" answer with less strong opinions?
      I also noticed the gradual decrease in resistance that students put towards medical marijuana as they became older...what would've caused this? Could it be Ryan's "age effect?"
      Great presentation of the topic :-)

      ReplyDelete
    7. @Eric, I agree with your comment "I beleieve that high school teenagers can not handle serious questions when it comes to medical marijuana. That was most likely was the biggest sampling error." When I was polling I noticed immaturity in quite a few students, including the upper class men.

      @Jessica, I think some of the people who answered "other faith" choose that option because they didn't really know, they haven't formed their own beliefs so they answered with the most global of all the answers. Therefore they probably didn't have beliefs or opinions about the other questions either.

      ReplyDelete
    8. Firstly, interesting profile picture. Second, for question 5 I believe everyone interprets extra curricular activities differently. Technically everyone participates in extra curricular activities.

      ReplyDelete
    9. I liked the poll, lots of various questions. Although I would have preferred to see the basic results of each question even though there may have not been any large cleavages. I thought it was interesting that honors and gen. ed students seem to more or less share results for the questions they were asked, although more honors students were asked than non-honors students. It's not because I think non-honors students smoke marijuana more than honors students, but I just expected non-honors students to generally support the proposition or not have any real opinion rather than have two somewhat balanced viewpoints.

      ReplyDelete
    10. Very nice job on the project itself, as this topic is of particular interest to me as well, so I found the results pretty interested. I also like the demographic question of whether or not they are employed or not, and I wish we would have put that into our demographic questions of the project. But hey, what can you do? The questions are a strong point of this project, very clear and un-leading, and that provide a specific answer for those who are questioned.

      ReplyDelete
    11. To tell you the truth first graph confused me for a while, and I am still trying to analyze the first graph to comprehend it better. What do the letters A, B, C and D exactly represent? Also, I do not understand how religion plays into Prop 203 at all, I am sure many students you guys polled might have hesitated asked why before answering that question. Your poll stumped me because legalizing marijuana is a controversial topic all over the U.S., yet the majority of the students support the proposition. I wonder why more freshmen would oppose legalization of marijuana, when the majority of the upperclassmen support the proposition? However, your poll is a very interesting topic, and I liked most of the questions and liked the other graphs, which were easy to analyze.

      ReplyDelete
    12. Hey guys- Your poll has a very interesting topic and I have been excited to see your results. Your questions and answers were straightforward and didn't confuse me one bit. No bias or pushing. However, your graphs were difficult for me to understand and it took me a while to figure out how they worked. You guys have a really cool looking background despite other things. Your biggest cleavage was definitely age and I think its funny and fitting that as you get older you support marijuana more and more.

      ReplyDelete
    13. I found very interesting that as people get older they tend to allow marijuana to be used in or as medicine. There is definitely a difference between ages within the results and I find it funny as people are saying yes as they get closer to the age where they can legally use it. Other than that, your results seemed to flow together very well. Overall, you guys did a great job displaying and explain your result as they were easy for me to understand. Good job you guys!!

      ReplyDelete
    14. It is not surprising that individuals with fewer religious beliefs tended to vote more in favor of yes on Prop 203. I found it interesting that both Honors and general education students both favored yes on the legislation. It also makes sense that the more informed an individual was on the parameters of the proposition, the more likely the individual was to vote yes Prop 203. I really liked your variation in graphs and your questions posed.

      ReplyDelete
    15. I like your topic choice and the layout of your results. I found it interesting that as people get older they were more likely to vote yes on prop 203. This could definitely be because as you get older you're exposed to more things, including weed and numerous other drugs. Your results didn't surprise me at all though. Great job though!

      ReplyDelete
    16. Interesting topic. Your questions are well written and clear. I find it kind of funny (though not surprising) that marijuana becomes more supported as a person gets old enough to use it and is more likely to have been exposed to it in some way. Like you said, having "I Don't Know" as a choice can tend to be a problem, especially it seems for high schoolers, since they tend to like taking the no-foul cop out answer. All in all though, you guys did a good job! Very informative.

      ReplyDelete
    17. @Vaibhav in the first graph A B C & D correspond with religion. All represented in Q2; A being Christian/Catholic, B being Spiritual, C being Other fair, and D being Atheist/Agnostic. The reason behind polling religion is because it does have a lot to do with Prop 203 certain religions have strict rules on drugs. For example Mormons don't allow any drugit even caffeine, let alone marijuana, whereas Judaism is alot more liberal and would allow it if ones health required it.

      ReplyDelete